If you're new to web design and do not know where to start, then probably the best that you devote some time initially to choose the appropriate editor of the Web. 2 most popular editor WYSIWYG (what you see what you get) Dreamweaver Microsoft placed on the first lane, and Macromedia.

This is leading to the often heated and sensitive debate, «which is the best editor?» Successfully This article tells you the pros and cons of both and the level of expertise that is necessary. At this stage, I would like to make it clear that I do not have a defense for Microsoft and Macromedia and have considerable experience of both editors Wide Web.

Front-band pros
The future with the front-band, the most recent version of 2003 and it was built na górze high - the success of Microsoft Office package from Microsoft. It helps to have a similar appearance to Microsoft Word and many other programs based office. «Non technical savv» evaluate a close resemblance, and easy-to-use menu system.

In fact pomeschaemo the first band has a lot to the user of such a text editor. Functionality to introduce images, tables and formatting text is very similar. So povysitelnoe from the famous text editor, to the same well-known editor Wide Web is not something great at all! Pomeschaemo the first band also has an abundance of ready to use templates, particularly useful for the consumer poslushnika.

Pro Dreamweaver
Macromedia products have been designed specifically with web design in mind, and Dreamweaver industry standard for Web editors. Dreamweaver is a glorious lens hood preliminary instruments mixed inside with rich taste graphical user interface.

Dreamweaver 8, the most recent version of the suite Studio 8 Macromedia. Dense implementation of applications in the studio skazovo. Pereklyuchayusch from Dreamweaver to another product such feierverki, flash and ColdFusion absolute «doddle» and real-time contributor too!

Dreamweaver also allows you to build your own custom-built templates, allowing hundreds of pages of changes to be made with one single change - very large web sites! It also has a sizeable block of common appointments database which makes creating dynamic pages breeze.

Dreamweaver has an extensive collection of tools preliminary and may at times be a bit too complicated for dreamweaverkotoroe wants to edit pages. By joy, Macromedia helps existing and part of Macromedia Studio suite and includes easy maintenance website. «Non techies» can edit the content of the pages, yet protected encoding of the page - so no banana skin here!

Front-band mob
Front-strip simple and easy to use often produce a series of unnecessary code that can be difficult in order to govern. It was designed specifically for Internet Explorer (TE) and is not remained the same standards of the World Wide Web. This means view Web pages done at TE but often a bit out of sync in the other major browsers like Mozilla Firefox.

Another low-noise front-band which Web servers must be placed at the first band to get the nomination, that some features work.

Dreamweaver mob
Dreamweaver is not as easy to use and can look a bit off and intimidate the consumer poslushnika. Lack of tools and practicality beginner can upset inexperienced consumers. Dreamweaver is also a bit expensive than pomeschaemo the first strip.
Conclusion

Dreamweaver even professional web editor. It was designed to be used for commercial environment and bring benefits of Web design tools, part of a large suite Macromedia, offers a general-purpose database of force and provides a wide range of e-commerce.

Front-band ontheonehand was designed for the average home user with a modest interest in Web design. Ideal for beginners and offers a range of special effects that will keep you mnogodelnym for quite period of time.

I think that they both provide value for deg and aimed at different markets. Novice consumers will benefit front-band, where as a professional web designer will require a preliminary tools and more pravopodobn in order to choose for Dreamweaver.